|
Abstract
|
The issues connected with counteracting the legalization (laundering) of proceeds of crime and terrorism financing are topical issues in modern society. In order to solve these problems, the global system to counter this criminal phenomenon has been created. The Russian Federation is
one of the member states of the intergovernmental organization “The Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering” (FATF). The system for combating the laundering of proceeds of crime and
terrorism financing, including the law enforcement system, the subjects of which perform specific tasks to identify, suppress and investigate relevant crimes, has been established in the Russian state.
The effectiveness of law enforcement agencies activities depends on the established cooperation with the Federal Financial Monitoring Service, which starts from the stage of the initiation of a criminal
case and can continue throughout the whole criminal investigation process. These state bodies carry out mutual exchange of information on suspicious transactions of the persons whose activities can be
connected with the legalization of proceeds of crime. The criteria for assessing the relevance of the results of financial investigations by law enforcement agencies and supervisory authorities are discussed
in the article. The problems and shortcomings of the interaction between law enforcement agencies and Rosfinmonitoring have been revealed, the ways of their elimination are proposed
|
|
References
|
1. Interv’yu zamestitelya direktora Federal’noy sluzhby po finansovomu monitoringu [Interview of the Deputy
Director of the Federal Service for Financial Monitoring]. Rosfinmonitoring: ofitsial’niy sayt [Rosfinmonitoring: official
site]. Available at: https://pasmi.ru/archive/201867/ (Accessed November 20, 2018).
2. Rohlin V., Danilova N., Nikolaeva T. Ispol’zovanie spetsial’nyh buhgalterskih znaniy pri rassledovanii
ekonomicheskih prestupleniy [The use of special accounting knowledge in the investigation of economic crimes].
Zakonnost’ – Legality, 2006, no. 4, pp. 29-31.
3. Sheyfer S.A. Obnovlenie pravovoy reglamentatsii dokazyvaniya po UPK RF: shag vpered?[Updating the
legal regulation of evidence under the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation: a step forward?].
Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and law, 2004, no. 12, pp. 35-42.
4. Shelegov Yu.V., Zagor’yan S.G. Klassifikatsii kosvennyh dokazatel’stv: osnovaniya, teoreticheskaya i
prakticheskaya znachimost’ [Classification of indirect evidence: grounds, theoretical and practical significance].
Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii – Bulletin of the East-Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal
Affairs of Russia, 2015, no. 3 (74), pp. 67-73.
5. Tugarinov N.V. Ispol’zovanie vozmozhnostey Rosfinmonitoringa v operativno-rozysknom obespechenii
ustanovleniya imushchestva, podlezhashchego konfiskatsii [Using the possibilities of Rosfinmonitoring in the
operational-search support for the establishment of property subject to confiscation]. Alleya nauki – Science Alley,
2018, no. 3 (19). Available at: http://Alley-science/ru (Accessed November 20, 2018).
6. Surov O.A., Klimovich L.P. Ispol’zovanie rezul’tatov finansovyh rassledovaniy v raskrytii legalizatsii prestupnyh
dohodov, poluchennyh ot nezakonnogo oborota narkotikov [Using the results of financial investigations in the
disclosure of the legalization of criminal proceeds from drug trafficking]. Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta
FSKN Rossii – Bulletin of the Siberian Law Institute Federal Drug Control Service of Russia, 2016, no. 2 (23), pp. 37-45.
|
