Author

Oleynik V.V.

Title of article

HOUSE ARREST AS A MEASURE OF RESTRAINT  IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AT THE PRESENT STAGE

Section

Section 12. The problems of legal science and law enforcement practice: young researchers’ view

Issue, year

1 (43) 2018

Abstract

 The need to respect the rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the criminal proceedings requires a clear answer to the question of when it is necessary to provide the guarantees for their provision. Therefore, when determining the measure of coercion, the main emphasis should be placed on the law-limiting nature of the procedural decision of the court or criminal prosecution body that creates a specific range of responsibilities for the participant in criminal proceedings in respect of whom such a decision was made. coercion is present where the duties are of a law-restrictive nature, regardless of the fact whether the subject of legal relations performs his (her) duties voluntarily or not. considering house arrest as a measure of restraint, it is necessary to take into account a number of conditions that enable the application of this measure to the participants in the criminal process, as well as the nature and extent of the committed act. The peculiarity of using the house arrest as a preventive measure at the present stage is the fact that this measure is mostly applied to the officials. one of the elements of application of house arrest is usually a set of restrictive measures of influence on participants in criminal proceedings, who are chosen by a judicial decision.

Keywords

 house arrest; law; measure of procedural coercion; official; suspect; accused.

References

1.  D’yachenko  A.P. Domashniy arest kak instrument realizatsii ugolovnoy politiki (sravnitel’nyy analiz zakonodatel’nogo opyta Rossii i zarubezhnykh gosudarstv) [Home arrest as an instrument for the implementation of criminal policy (comparative analysis of the legislative experience of Russia and foreign countries)]. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk – Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2014, no. 3, pp. 107-122. 2. Demina I.V. Domashniy arest kak mera presecheniya, al’ternativnaya soderzhaniyu pod strazhey [Home arrest as a preventive measure, alternative to detention]. Ekonomika, pravo, menedzhment. Sbornik trudov molodykh issledovateley Baykal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Economics, law, management: a collection of works of young researchers of the Baikal State University, 2014, no. 1. Available at: http://izdatelstvo.isea.ru/epm/ search.aspx (Accessed November 29, 2017).

3. Voronov D.A. Domashniy arest kak mera bezopasnosti: sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya [Home Arrest as a Security Measure: State and Development Prospects]. Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Proceedings of the Altai State University, 2013, volume 2, no. 2 (78), pp. 86-89.

4. Garipova R.A. Mery presecheniya: zakon i praktika [Preventive measures: law and practice]. Simvol nauki – A symbol of science, 2016, no. 1, pp. 136-137.

5. Koloskova S.V. Domashniy arest kak mera presecheniya v sovremennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii: doktrina, yuridicheskaya tekhnika i pravoprimenitel’naya praktika. Avtoref. Kand. Diss. [Home arrest as a measure of restraint in modern criminal justice of Russia: doctrine, legal technique and law enforcement practice. Autoabstract Cand. Diss.]. Moscow, 2014. 33 p.

 6. Fetishcheva L.M. Primenenie mer presecheniya pri proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh, sovershennykh v sfere predprinimatel’skoy deyatel’nosti. Kand. Diss. [The application of preventive measures in the criminal proceedings on crimes committed in the field of entrepreneurial activity. Cand. Diss.]. Nizhny Novgorod, 2016. 33 p.

7. Ushakov A.S. O ponyatii «primenenie mery presecheniya» v ugolovnom protsesse [On the notion of “application of preventive measures” in the criminal process]. Vestnik Ural’skogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii – Bulletin of the Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2016, no. 1, pp. 22-25.

 8. Andronik N.A. Zalog, domashniy arest: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya [Pledge, Home Arrest: Problems of Legal Regulation]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii – Bulletin of the Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2014, no. 4, pp. 69-75.

9. Gliznutsa S.I. Primenenie mer presecheniya v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh. Avtoref. Kand. Diss. [Application of preventive measures against minors Autoabstract Cand. Diss.]. Tyumen, 2011. 23 p. 10. Shigurova E.I., Galygina T.Yu. Domashniy arest: problemy teorii i praktiki deystvuyushchego zakonodatel’stva [Home arrest: problems of theory and practice of current legislation]. Ogarev-online – Ogaryov-online, 2016, no. 13, pp. 3-7. Available at: http://journal.mrsu.ru/ (Accessed November 28, 2017).

11. Grushko I.T. Otdel’nye problemy izbraniya i primeneniya mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta [Separate problems of the election and application of preventive measures in the form of house arrest]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya – The world of science, culture, education, 2015, no. 3 (52), pp. 234-236.

12. Voronov D.A. Zapret opredelennykh deystviy v ramkakh zaloga, domashnego aresta i novoy mery presecheniya [Prohibition of certain actions in the context of bail, house arrest and a new measure of restraint]. Rossiyskiy sud’ya – The Russian judge, 2016, no. 3, pp. 21-25.

13.  Kolesnikov  M.V. Problemy primeneniya mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta [Problems of applying preventive measures in the form of house arrest]. Aktual’nye problemy ekonomiki i prava – Actual problems of economics and law, 2015, no. 2, pp. 240-247. 14. Gabaraev A.Sh., Novikov A.V. Osobennosti primeneniya elektronnykh sredstv kontrolya i nadzora pri ispolnenii nakazaniy al’ternativnykh lisheniyu svobody [Features of the use of electronic means of control and supervision in the execution of punishments alternative to deprivation of liberty]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya – Modern problems of science and education, 2015, no. 2-3, p. 283. 15.  Kurakina  G.N. Problemy realizatsii ugolovno-protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva pri primenenii domashnego aresta [Problems of the implementation of criminal procedural legislation in the application of house arrest]. Sudebnaya vlast’ i ugolovnyy protsess – Judicial power and the criminal process, 2016, no. 2, pp. 173-176.